2. Division 2008
Archive:  

Russia
Premier League
1. Division
2. Division
PFL Cup - 2. Division
Cup
Super Cup
 
 
Free soccer content for your website
Bet on the 2. Division with Bet365.com and get 100 EURO for FREE.Bet on the 2. Division with Bet365.com and get 100 EURO for FREE.
League table
    Team Overall     Home     Away      
      GP   W D L GS GA     W D L GS GA     W D L GS GA     GD P  
1. 1 FK Chita 27   18 8 1 53 21 10 3 1 32 13 8 5 0 21 8 +32 62
2. 2 Smena Komsomolsk 27   17 2 8 50 21 11 1 2 31 7 6 1 6 19 14 +29 53
3. 3 Irtysh 1946 Omsk 27   14 7 6 46 30 11 2 0 34 12 3 5 6 12 18 +16 49
4. 4 Sibir Novosibirsk II 27   11 7 9 36 40 8 4 2 23 16 3 3 7 13 24 -4 40
5. 5 Sibiryak Bratsk 27   9 8 10 34 37 6 5 2 16 9 3 3 8 18 28 -3 35
6. 6 Metallurg Krasnoyarsk 27   9 7 11 38 34 7 2 4 22 9 2 5 7 16 25 +4 34
7. 7 Okean Nakhodka 27   8 10 9 22 28 5 6 2 13 9 3 4 7 9 19 -6 34
8. 8 Amur Blagoveshch 27   6 7 14 29 45 4 4 5 19 17 2 3 9 10 28 -16 25
9. 9 Kuzbass Kemerovo 27   7 4 16 27 49 5 2 7 16 20 2 2 9 11 29 -22 25
10. 10 Sakhalin Sakhalinsk 27   3 6 18 18 48 2 4 8 11 24 1 2 10 7 24 -30 15
Last update:November 20th, 2008 23:52
Form table
    Team Overall     Home     Away
      GP   W D L GS GA P     W D L GS GA P     W D L GS GA P
1. (2) Smena Komsomolsk 6   5 0 1 11 1 15 2 0 1 3 1 6 3 0 0 8 0 9
2. (6) Metallurg Krasnoyarsk 6   4 1 1 13 7 13 3 0 0 7 0 9 1 1 1 6 7 4
3. (1) FK Chita 6   3 3 0 8 5 12 1 2 0 4 3 5 2 1 0 4 2 7
4. (3) Irtysh 1946 Omsk 6   2 3 1 10 9 9 2 1 0 7 4 7 0 2 1 3 5 2
5. (4) Sibir Novosibirsk II 6   2 2 2 8 11 8 2 1 0 7 5 7 0 1 2 1 6 1
6. (5) Sibiryak Bratsk 6   2 1 3 9 10 7 2 0 1 6 4 6 0 1 2 3 6 1
7. (7) Okean Nakhodka 6   2 0 4 6 8 6 2 0 1 5 3 6 0 0 3 1 5 0
8. (9) Kuzbass Kemerovo 6   1 2 3 5 8 5 1 1 1 3 3 4 0 1 2 2 5 1
9. (10) Sakhalin Sakhalinsk 6   1 2 3 2 6 5 1 2 0 2 1 5 0 0 3 0 5 0
10. (8) Amur Blagoveshch 6   1 0 5 7 14 3 1 0 2 6 6 3 0 0 3 1 8 0
Notice: The form of a club is derived from the 3 last home and 3 last away scores rather than directly from the 6 last scores in the league. This has been done so in order to erase the home advantage bias from the FORM, thus making the form more neutrally comparable.
Last update:November 20th, 2008 23:52