|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sunday |
Oct 15, 2006 |
B68 Toftir |
0 - 1 |
HB Torshavn |
i |
| Sunday |
Oct 15, 2006 |
IF Fuglafjordur |
1 - 2 |
EB Streymur |
i |
| Sunday |
Oct 15, 2006 |
VB Sumba Vagur |
2 - 0 |
NSI Runavik |
i |
| Tuesday |
Oct 17, 2006 |
KI Klaksvik |
1 - 4 |
GI Gota |
i |
| Tuesday |
Oct 17, 2006 |
B36 Torshavn |
2 - 2 |
Skala IF |
i |
| Saturday |
Oct 21, 2006 |
NSI Runavik |
2 - 0 |
B68 Toftir |
i |
| Saturday |
Oct 21, 2006 |
Skala IF |
1 - 1 |
VB Sumba Vagur |
i |
| Saturday |
Oct 21, 2006 |
GI Gota |
1 - 2 |
B36 Torshavn |
i |
| Saturday |
Oct 21, 2006 |
HB Torshavn |
2 - 0 |
IF Fuglafjordur |
i |
| Saturday |
Oct 21, 2006 |
EB Streymur |
0 - 1 |
KI Klaksvik |
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Team |
Overall |
|
|
Home |
|
|
Away |
| 1. |
(1) |
HB Torshavn |
6 |
|
6 |
0 |
0 |
14 |
3 |
18 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
9 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
8 |
2 |
9 |
| 2. |
(3) |
B36 Torshavn |
6 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
11 |
8 |
11 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
4 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
| 3. |
(6) |
GI Gota |
6 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
10 |
10 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
10 |
4 |
9 |
| 4. |
(2) |
EB Streymur |
6 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
11 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
| 5. |
(4) |
KI Klaksvik |
6 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
11 |
10 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
4 |
| 6. |
(9) |
B68 Toftir |
6 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
11 |
10 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
3 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
7 |
3 |
| 7. |
(5) |
NSI Runavik |
6 |
|
2 |
1 |
3 |
8 |
9 |
7 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
6 |
0 |
| 8. |
(7) |
Skala IF |
6 |
|
1 |
4 |
1 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
2 |
| 9. |
(8) |
VB Sumba Vagur |
6 |
|
1 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
17 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
8 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
1 |
| 10. |
(10) |
IF Fuglafjordur |
6 |
|
1 |
0 |
5 |
8 |
14 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
0 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
0 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
4 |
6 |
3 |
|
Notice: The form of a club is derived from the 3 last home and 3 last away scores rather than directly from the 6 last scores in the league. This has been done so in order to erase the home advantage bias from the FORM, thus making the form more neutrally comparable.
|
Last update:August 28th, 2008 16:44
|
|
|
|
|
|