|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sunday |
Nov 17, 2002 |
Union Espanola |
4 - 3 |
Univ de Concepcion |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 17, 2002 |
Coquimbo Unido |
0 - 0 |
Cobreloa Calama |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
Union San Felipe |
3 - 2 |
Deportes Temuco |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
Cobreloa Calama |
3 - 0 |
Univ Catolica |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
Santiago Morning |
0 - 2 |
Univ de Chile |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
Palestino Santiago |
3 - 1 |
Audax Italiano |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
Rangers Talca |
3 - 0 |
CD Huachipato |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
Univ de Concepcion |
1 - 1 |
Coquimbo Unido |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
CD Colo Colo |
2 - 0 |
Union Espanola |
i |
| Sunday |
Nov 24, 2002 |
Santiago Wanderers |
2 - 3 |
Cobresal Salvador |
i |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Team |
Overall |
|
|
Home |
|
|
Away |
| 1. |
(2) |
U. de Chile |
6 |
|
4 |
2 |
0 |
10 |
4 |
14 |
|
|
3 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
3 |
9 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
| 2. |
(10) |
A. Italiano |
6 |
|
3 |
2 |
1 |
9 |
8 |
11 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
| 3. |
(5) |
Wanderers |
6 |
|
3 |
1 |
2 |
9 |
8 |
10 |
|
|
2 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
6 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
| 4. |
(1) |
Cobreloa |
6 |
|
2 |
4 |
0 |
6 |
2 |
10 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
|
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
| 5. |
(7) |
Colo Colo |
6 |
|
2 |
3 |
1 |
8 |
5 |
9 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
| 6. |
(6) |
U. Espanola |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
8 |
8 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
8 |
4 |
7 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
| 7. |
(4) |
U. Catolica |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
9 |
9 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
5 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
| 8. |
(8) |
U. San Felipe |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
| 9. |
(14) |
Rangers Talca |
6 |
|
1 |
5 |
0 |
7 |
4 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
5 |
2 |
5 |
|
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
| 10. |
(9) |
Huachipato |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
2 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
6 |
3 |
| 11. |
(13) |
Palestino |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
7 |
8 |
|
|
2 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
1 |
7 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
| 12. |
(3) |
Cobresal |
6 |
|
2 |
2 |
2 |
7 |
9 |
8 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
4 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
5 |
4 |
| 13. |
(12) |
U. Concepcion |
6 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
10 |
13 |
5 |
|
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
6 |
2 |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2 |
6 |
7 |
3 |
| 14. |
(15) |
S. Morning |
6 |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
8 |
5 |
|
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
| 15. |
(11) |
Coquimbo |
6 |
|
0 |
5 |
1 |
3 |
6 |
5 |
|
|
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
2 |
| 16. |
(16) |
Temuco |
6 |
|
0 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
8 |
3 |
|
|
0 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
|
|
0 |
2 |
1 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
|
Notice: The form of a club is derived from the 3 last home and 3 last away scores rather than directly from the 6 last scores in the league. This has been done so in order to erase the home advantage bias from the FORM, thus making the form more neutrally comparable.
|
Last update:September 28th, 2006 11:31
|
|
|
|
|
|